<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Footie Canada Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://footiecanada.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://footiecanada.com</link>
	<description>Soccer Blog for Canadians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on About Footie Canada Blog by Cristian</title>
		<link>http://footiecanada.com/about/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Im looking for someone to do a piece on TFC for the upcoming 2010 season, let me know if you&#039;re interested and maybe we can work something out.

It would be a Basic preview of TFC going into their fourth season, the digital mag I publish is not about being a sports Journalist its about being a fan, so just write your oipinion.

Let me know if you would like to do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im looking for someone to do a piece on TFC for the upcoming 2010 season, let me know if you&#8217;re interested and maybe we can work something out.</p>
<p>It would be a Basic preview of TFC going into their fourth season, the digital mag I publish is not about being a sports Journalist its about being a fan, so just write your oipinion.</p>
<p>Let me know if you would like to do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time to Revamp the TFC Defence by TFCman99</title>
		<link>http://footiecanada.com/2010/01/15/time-to-revamp-the-tfc-defence/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>TFCman99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiecanada.com/?p=339#comment-37</guid>
		<description>It looks like Mo is going to make a move for 1 of the 3 with Egyptian central defender Ibrahim Said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Mo is going to make a move for 1 of the 3 with Egyptian central defender Ibrahim Said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Much Ado about Man U&#8230; and Leeds too by bobbygee</title>
		<link>http://footiecanada.com/2010/01/07/much-ado-about-man-u-and-leeds-too/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbygee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiecanada.com/?p=305#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be surprised if Man U has a long hard season. The signs of this have been sown since the beginning of the season. I have a hunch Sir Alex will walk away at the end of this season. he has won every title there is to be won.  http://bobbygee.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be surprised if Man U has a long hard season. The signs of this have been sown since the beginning of the season. I have a hunch Sir Alex will walk away at the end of this season. he has won every title there is to be won.  <a href="http://bobbygee.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bobbygee.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Musing over an NASL Move for Ottawa:  Is Malhotra the Man? by Matt MA</title>
		<link>http://footiecanada.com/2009/12/07/nasl-in-ottawa-is-malhotra-the-man/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiecanada.com/?p=278#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I would love to see NASL in Ottawa on a normal field :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see NASL in Ottawa on a normal field <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The UEFA Coefficient:  Will Germany Snatch an Extra Champion&#8217;s League Spot from Italy? by Louisi Ana</title>
		<link>http://footiecanada.com/2009/12/16/the-uefa-coefficient/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Louisi Ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiecanada.com/?p=285#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Viva Italia! Italy for the most part does its best under pressure.  So bring on the Tedeschi, and lets crush &#039;em.  Forza Milan lol


Louisi Ana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viva Italia! Italy for the most part does its best under pressure.  So bring on the Tedeschi, and lets crush &#8216;em.  Forza Milan lol</p>
<p>Louisi Ana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give Henry a hand! by FCP</title>
		<link>http://footiecanada.com/2009/11/19/give-henry-a-hand/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>FCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiecanada.com/?p=255#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Henry committed a hand ball.  Suggesting he broke the rules cuts to the heart of whether you consider Henry a cheater which I for one, do not.  I think he instinctively touched the ball rather than think that he could direct the ball with his hand and then pass to a teammate without getting caught.  The decisive moment happened within a few seconds.  Henry&#039;s reaction was instinct not intent in my opinion.  A clear foul that should have been called but that is a referee issue not an Henry issue.    

Going forward, when a player commits handball are we now supposed to label him a cheater?  Handballs happen all the time in almost every single game.  In many cases, handballs are intentional.  Many times intentional handballs are instinctual reactions.  Are we to throw the book at these players and consider them rule breakers and cheaters?  Usually a foul is called and the opposing team gets a free kick.  Sometimes, players get carded for intentional handballs.   That&#039;s it.  No one debates whether these players are cheaters or whether they are ruining the integrity of the game.

What about a regular foul?  Or what about cardable offences?  Or what about offences that lead to penalties?  Do we consider the penalized players rule breakers or cheaters?  Do we consider them unsportsmanlike?  Not generally, even thought they &quot;broke&quot; the rules.

What about the scenario when a defender sometimes deliberately stops a ball from entering the net with his hand?  A penalty is called and we go from there.  Now, this player is deliberately using his hand knowing that he is not allowed to do that.  Is this player a cheater?  Does this player get lambasted in the world press?  What would everyone think if France had a shot on net and Irish defender Dunne intentionally dove in the way and used his hand to stop what would be an obvious goal?  And what if Given saved the ensuing penalty?  Would we be celebrating Dunne&#039;s decision or would we be critical of him and calling him a cheater because of his deliberate handball? 

Back to Henry, yes, he did hand the ball.  It should have been called.  It was not.  That&#039;s what the referee is for.  And in many cases, referees being human, they make mistakes.  Granted, this is a huge mistake which potentially cost Ireland a spot in the World Cup.  We don&#039;t know for sure what would have happened had the goal been disallowed.  Ireland could still have lost.  We will never know.  I do not think anything should happen to Henry.  At worst, give him a yellow card for intentional handball.  

Anyone who watches a lot of soccer will obviously know that bad calls happen all the time.  In my view, this is more an issue about the referee, the location of the linesman and the obvious fact that referees sometimes make glaring errors.  Some games have clear offside goals allowed.  Some games have too much extra time and then a team scores a tying goal or gets the winner.  Bad things happen all the time in soccer because the game uses human referees.  Maybe it&#039;s time to consider video replays for goals and infractions in the penalty area.  This is a separate debate left for another time because there is a lot that would need to be considered for incorporating video replay.  

The more likely solution is to consider the two additional referee system being tested out in the Europa League.  I am confident that the second referee would have caught the handball and we would not be having this debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry committed a hand ball.  Suggesting he broke the rules cuts to the heart of whether you consider Henry a cheater which I for one, do not.  I think he instinctively touched the ball rather than think that he could direct the ball with his hand and then pass to a teammate without getting caught.  The decisive moment happened within a few seconds.  Henry&#8217;s reaction was instinct not intent in my opinion.  A clear foul that should have been called but that is a referee issue not an Henry issue.    </p>
<p>Going forward, when a player commits handball are we now supposed to label him a cheater?  Handballs happen all the time in almost every single game.  In many cases, handballs are intentional.  Many times intentional handballs are instinctual reactions.  Are we to throw the book at these players and consider them rule breakers and cheaters?  Usually a foul is called and the opposing team gets a free kick.  Sometimes, players get carded for intentional handballs.   That&#8217;s it.  No one debates whether these players are cheaters or whether they are ruining the integrity of the game.</p>
<p>What about a regular foul?  Or what about cardable offences?  Or what about offences that lead to penalties?  Do we consider the penalized players rule breakers or cheaters?  Do we consider them unsportsmanlike?  Not generally, even thought they &#8220;broke&#8221; the rules.</p>
<p>What about the scenario when a defender sometimes deliberately stops a ball from entering the net with his hand?  A penalty is called and we go from there.  Now, this player is deliberately using his hand knowing that he is not allowed to do that.  Is this player a cheater?  Does this player get lambasted in the world press?  What would everyone think if France had a shot on net and Irish defender Dunne intentionally dove in the way and used his hand to stop what would be an obvious goal?  And what if Given saved the ensuing penalty?  Would we be celebrating Dunne&#8217;s decision or would we be critical of him and calling him a cheater because of his deliberate handball? </p>
<p>Back to Henry, yes, he did hand the ball.  It should have been called.  It was not.  That&#8217;s what the referee is for.  And in many cases, referees being human, they make mistakes.  Granted, this is a huge mistake which potentially cost Ireland a spot in the World Cup.  We don&#8217;t know for sure what would have happened had the goal been disallowed.  Ireland could still have lost.  We will never know.  I do not think anything should happen to Henry.  At worst, give him a yellow card for intentional handball.  </p>
<p>Anyone who watches a lot of soccer will obviously know that bad calls happen all the time.  In my view, this is more an issue about the referee, the location of the linesman and the obvious fact that referees sometimes make glaring errors.  Some games have clear offside goals allowed.  Some games have too much extra time and then a team scores a tying goal or gets the winner.  Bad things happen all the time in soccer because the game uses human referees.  Maybe it&#8217;s time to consider video replays for goals and infractions in the penalty area.  This is a separate debate left for another time because there is a lot that would need to be considered for incorporating video replay.  </p>
<p>The more likely solution is to consider the two additional referee system being tested out in the Europa League.  I am confident that the second referee would have caught the handball and we would not be having this debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give Henry a hand! by Juve</title>
		<link>http://footiecanada.com/2009/11/19/give-henry-a-hand/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Juve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiecanada.com/?p=255#comment-12</guid>
		<description>He should get whatever penalty is given out for an intentional hand ball.  As we saw with the retro-active &quot;diving&quot; suspension given to Eduardo, there is a precedent for a suspension after the fact based on video evidence.

I don&#039;t think the answer is any sort of video replay, given there are no stoppages of time in soccer.  A second referee on the field is the answer.  If it works in hockey on a small rink, surerly there&#039;s room for one more man on a soccer pitch.  An extra set of eyes close to the action would decrease the likelihood of these sorts of controversies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He should get whatever penalty is given out for an intentional hand ball.  As we saw with the retro-active &#8220;diving&#8221; suspension given to Eduardo, there is a precedent for a suspension after the fact based on video evidence.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the answer is any sort of video replay, given there are no stoppages of time in soccer.  A second referee on the field is the answer.  If it works in hockey on a small rink, surerly there&#8217;s room for one more man on a soccer pitch.  An extra set of eyes close to the action would decrease the likelihood of these sorts of controversies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Old Firm and a Two-Tier English Premier League by The Old Firm and a Two-Tier&#8230;&#160;&#124;&#160;The Gers Info</title>
		<link>http://footiecanada.com/2009/11/16/the-old-firm-and-a-two-tier-english-premier-league/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>The Old Firm and a Two-Tier&#8230;&#160;&#124;&#160;The Gers Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiecanada.com/?p=223#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] here to read the rest: The Old Firm and a Two-Tier&#8230;    Filed under Old Firm, Rangers, celtic Tags: between-the-two, bigger-pond, celtic, club-rises, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to read the rest: The Old Firm and a Two-Tier&#8230;    Filed under Old Firm, Rangers, celtic Tags: between-the-two, bigger-pond, celtic, club-rises, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update to Last Post by Juve</title>
		<link>http://footiecanada.com/2009/11/14/update-to-last-post/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Juve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiecanada.com/?p=239#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Yes, I saw it was available via webfeed on another site, so not sure what the CSA&#039;s:  &quot;not having the tv/internet for us&quot; is supposed to mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I saw it was available via webfeed on another site, so not sure what the CSA&#8217;s:  &#8220;not having the tv/internet for us&#8221; is supposed to mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update to Last Post by MM</title>
		<link>http://footiecanada.com/2009/11/14/update-to-last-post/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>MM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiecanada.com/?p=239#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Actually, there was live coverage in Macedonia. I know, since I watched the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there was live coverage in Macedonia. I know, since I watched the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
